Table 18 definition

Table 18. Hand contamination levels (es, L/hands) and frequency distributions (%) derived for (manual) open pour M&L methods using four container size categories ~, tank-top and induction bowl respectively Tank-top category 1 category 2 lower Upper P* lower upper P* Container size (L) 1 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 99 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 1 5 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 95 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 5 10 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 70 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 30 20 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 60 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 40 Induction bowl category 1 category 2 lower Upper P* lower upper P* Container size (L) 1 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 99 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 1 5 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 99 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 1 10 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 80 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 20 20 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 70 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 30 ^ Indicative ranges were derived from an analysis of hand contamination levels during a standard pouring procedure (Xxxxxxx et al 2000, Xxxxxxx et al, 1999; Xxxxxxx et al, 2000, Xxxxx et al, 2009). Indicative frequency distribution were derived from Glass et al (2009) Table 19: Whole body contamination levels (eopen pour) derived for (manual) open pour M&L methods using four container size categories, and total body exposure during use of mechanical transfer devices (emtd) Category Container size (L) Whole body contamination (excl. hands) after open pour1, eopen pour (l/whole body)^ Total body contamination after using mechanical transfer devices (MTD)2, emtd (l/total body)^ Lower Upper Mean Lower Upper Mean* Lower Upper 2 >2.5 7.5 1.5E-6 1.5E-7 1.5E-5 - - - 3 >7.5 15 5.0E-6 5.0E-7 5.0E-5 - - - 4 >15 25 2.0E-5 2.0E-6 2.0E-4 - - - 5 25 - - - 7E-5 1.0E-7 1.5E-3 1 derived from whole body contamination (coveralls) after a standard pouring procedure (induction bowl). These values were also adopted for tank-top pour. Note: If raw data was not available for all combinations of methods and container sizes, values were adopted from other similar-sized container sizes 2 operator contamination based on different body parts depending on type of loading systems used. Measurements taken after one protocol of six different mechanical transfer devices including both induction hoppers and closed transfer systems (including volumes of 5l-25l) ^ Lower and upper ranges were derived using the mean values with a factor 0,1 and 10 respectively (as standard deviations could not be calculated from the studies) Note Derived from: eopen pour (Xxxxxxx et al 2000, Xxxxxxx et al, 1999, Xxxxxxx et al, 2000; Xxxxx et al, 2009) and emtd (Xxxxx et al, 2009)
Sample 1
Table 18. Volvo CE derived data The information in the table above is confidential and must not be used in any publications unless granted by Volvo CE
Sample 1
Table 18. Average income over the last six months in FC Income by source of sales Bandundu Equateur Total Kikwit-Idiofa Mbandaka-Bikoro Mbandaka- Ngombe - Bobangi Gemena-Akula # Average income # Average income # Average income # Average income # Average income Peanut 8 17,275 (6,767) 22 34,977 (17,164) - - 44 43,295 (11,244) 74 38,009 (8,417) Livestock 18 43,267 (20,486) 35 75,366 (23,129) 6 23,225 (6,847) 14 33,271 (8,461) 73 55,092 (12,407) Gathering - - 1 1,000 21 56,240 22 53,730 (0,00) (17,262) (16,649) Squash 13 5,031 (788) 1 60,000 (0,00) 4 12,625 (6,492) 18 9,772 (3,358) Leaves for wrapping food 2 1,850 (1,650) 12 9,548 (4,257) 5 18,700 (7,247) 16 4,525 (1,615) 35 8,119 (2,038) Vegetables 112 23,866 (14,506) 63 7,760 (2,820) 11 17,600 (7,557) 60 2,493 (516) 246 14,248 (6,663) Corn 61 16,921 (3,213) 64 47,092 (13,652) 11 35,573 (11,256) 68 14,074 (2,109) 204 26,443 (4,577) Cassava 1 5,000 (0,00) 54 97,407 (44,120) 15 78,700 (29,280) 34 22,967 (6,247) 104 69,484 (23,500) Cowpea 3 34,800 (25,242) 10 25,375 (9,219) - - 19 14,955 (4,562) 32 20,072 (4,429) Fish 22 60,983 (19,834) 17 22,688 (8,318) 66 55,945 (6,740) 2 16,000 (14,000) 107 50,951 (6,054) Rice 6 22,267 (11,729) 14 145,186 (63,866) - - 19 29,479 (12,546) 39 69,905 (24,974) Vetiver 3 47,267 (17,462) 1 15,000 (0,00) - - 2 4,750 (3,250) 6 39,200 (14,749) Vine, alcohol 1 10,000 (0,00) 22 64,659 (24,676) 2 80,000 (40,000) 9 16,311 (7,369) 34 51,156 (16,534) Poultry 9 1,583 (235) 16 5,591 (978) 4 7,875 (3,631) 11 3,100 (715) 40 5,906 (1,247) Total/xxxxx xx 259 24,872 (6,733) 332 48,423 (8,595) 123 47,989 (5,493) 323 20,523 (2,389) 1,000 33,953 (3,431) (*) The numbers in parentheses are the standard deviation values. We asked surveyed households « what is the amount of production that have produced that was sold in the last six months », reasoning that the last six months corresponds well to the most recent harvest and sales of produce in the last growing season prior to the end of project survey. From this data we show that the average income generated by household was 33,953 FC which is equal to $81 using the same exchange rate of 420 FC/1$. The actual income per product in order of importance over that contribute to this average figure are: rice 69.905 FC ($166); cassava 69,484 FC ($165); livestock 55,092 FC ($131); gathering 53,730 FC ($128); alcohol 51,156 FC ($121); fish 50,591 FC ($121); vetiver 39,200 FC ($93); peanut 38,009 FC ($90) and so on. The average income that was the highest is along the Mban...
Sample 1

Examples of Table 18 in a sentence

  • The immunity of ESA representative of its type shall be tested by the method(s) according to ISO 7637-2, as described in Annex 10 with the test levels given in Table 18.

  • Table 18: Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2008-2012 (0 complete corruption to 10 no corruption)31 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Croatia 4.4 4.1 4.1 4.0 4.6 EU-27 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.3 6.4 More vigorous establishment of the rule of law implies among other things enforced regulatory framework, more effective functioning of judiciary, and efficient protection of property rights, financial stability and discipline and control of corruption.

  • At a final stage, the tool detects the type of tokens, classifying them in one of the categories of Table 18.

  • Metric Model R2 RMSE Density sqrt(density) = 1.979 + 4.0048*sqrt(A) 0.34 76.55 Table 18: Model Variable.

  • The report shall be in the format shown in Table 18 below unless modified by the Agency within the notice requirements indicated in A.3. of this Section.

  • Table 18 Immunity of ESA Test pulse number Immunity test level Functional status for systems: Related to immunity related functions Not related to immunity related functions 1 III C D 2a III B D 2b III C D 3a/3b III A D 7.20.

  • Table 18 The immunity of ESA representative of its type shall be tested by the method(s) according to ISO 7637-2, as described in Annex 10 with the test levels given in Table 18.

  • In order to forecast future values for 2030, and thanks to a quite steady evolution trend, a linear regression has been performed (Table 18).

  • All the international lines that are committed for the year 2000 and the long-term transmission line options are shown in Figures 1.2 and 1.3. Existing international line transfer capabilities at the year 2000 are also listed in Table 1.7. The totally new international line options for are listed in Table 1.8 for the horizon 2000 to 2020.

  • Table 18 shows the project scoring criteria for GNRC’s 2035 and 2040 long-range transportation plans (Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxxx, 2017).


More Definitions of Table 18

Table 18. The Mozambican phase- out for SADC and SACU members Mozambique and SADC
Sample 1
Table 18. Anticipated impacts of contextualised pathways in Sofia Care recipient (CR) Positive impacts / benefits • Improvement of health and social status, and the overall quality of life. • Avoid redundant visits to hospital or GP. • Confidence and less fear due to monitoring of condition. • Active patient involvement in managing his/her condition. Negative impacts / costs • Intrusion by a multitude of carers and technology. • Time taken for training in the use of equipment. • Time taken to take telehealth readings. Informal carer (IFC) Positive impacts / benefits • Empowerment of people permitting them to better perform their care role. Negative impacts / costs • Increased workload. Social care provider (SCP) Positive impacts / benefits • Enrichment of their role. • Better informed about CR needs. • Establishing collaboration culture with HCP. • Reduced number of visits by SCP staff to the home. Negative impacts / costs • Increased workload. • Time taken to provide services. • Time taken for training in the use of equipment. Health care provider (HCP) Positive impacts / benefits • Timely provision of care when needed. • More specialisation and gaining valuable ICT experience. • Less time wasted from redundant visits. • More efficient use of personnel. • Establishing collaboration culture with SCP. • Reduced number of visits to the HCP. Negative impacts / costs • Time taken to provide services. • Time taken for training in the use of equipment. Third-sector care provider (TSCP) Positive impacts / benefits • Enrichment of their role, making them participant in the care act of elders. Negative impacts / costs • New tasks, more responsibilities.
Sample 1

Related to Table 18

  • Table 4 Ending this Addendum when the Approved Addendum Changes Ending this Addendum when the Approved Addendum changes Which Parties may end this Addendum as set out in Section 19: Importer Exporter neither Party

  • Table 1 means Table 1 of the Reporting ITS.

  • Table 2 means Table 2 of the Reporting ITS.

  • Table E academic outcomes at receiving institution Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the receiving institution Was the component successfully completed by the student? [Yes/No] Number of ECTS credits Receiving institution grade Total: [Signature of responsible person in receiving institution and date]

  • HCPCS means CMS' Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System, which describes products, supplies, procedures and health professional services and includes, the American Medical Associations (AMA's) Physician "Current Procedural Terminology", Fourth Edition (CPT-4) codes, alphanumeric codes, and related modifiers.

  • Table means the table at the end of this §4a.

  • Composite mortality tables means mortality tables with rates of mortality that do not distinguish between smokers and nonsmokers.

  • Maintenance Margin means the minimum amount of money required in your Trading Account as specified on the Trading Platform in order to keep a Transaction open on the Trading Platform.

  • Minimum Level (ML means the concentration at which the entire analytical system must give a recognizable signal and an acceptable calibration point. The ML is the concentration in a sample that is equivalent to the concentration of the lowest calibration standard analyzed by a specific analytical procedure, assuming that all the method-specified sample weights, volumes and processing steps have been followed.

  • Standard reference compendia means the American Medical Association Drug Evaluations, the

  • Digital Signal Level 0 (DS-0 means the lowest-level signal in the time division multiplex digital hierarchy, and represents a voice-grade channel operating at either the 56 Kbps or 64 Kbps transmission bit rates. There are twenty-four (24) DS-0 channels in a DS-1.

  • MARPOL 73/78 means the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as amended by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto and by any other amendment in force thereafter;

  • Sound level meter means an instrument which includes a microphone, amplifier, RMS detector, integrator or time averager, output meter, and weighting networks used to measure sound pressure levels.

  • Three-dimensional reference system means a system as described in Appendix 2 to this annex;

  • State Level Monitoring Cell means the body constituted by the State Government for the control and elimination of ragging in institutions within the jurisdiction of the State, established under a State Law or on the advice of the Central Government, as the case may be.