Policy Making Sample Clauses

Policy Making. The policy making function is the exclusive power of the Board and it is without authority to delegate such power to any other individual or group. However, the Board recognizes a responsibility to consult with and to be advised by enlightened professional opinion.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Policy Making. The Association will be notified prior to final action by the Board of any contemplated changes in written policy directly affecting educators in the District. Notification will be through the Board agenda being provided to the Association in each building and to the Association president at the same time it is provided to the Board.
Policy Making. The Board agrees to send the Association President a copy of the monthly School board agenda on Tuesday prior to the meeting.
Policy Making. Individual schools and individual teachers enjoy discretion. It is necessary for the proper delivery of a professional service that they should do so. It is equally important however that they should contribute fully to the realisation of policy objectives established nationally or by the local authority. It is the task of school management to ensure that national and local authority policy statements are fully discussed and imaginatively implemented within educational establishments. Open discussion involving staff at every level is essential if schools are to xxxxxx the participative style of management which is required. Participation in decision making can serve to enhance self esteem and thereby improve motivation. It is likely that staff will feel a greater degree of commitment to policies which they have personally been involved in developing. Teachers as professionals should be entitled to contribute to debates on major policy issues.
Policy Making. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxx The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics Edited by Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, and S. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Print Publication Date: Mar 2013 Online Publication Date: Aug 2013 Subject: Political Science, Public Policy, Comparative Politics DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0027 Abstract and Keywords This article is concerned with policy making, which can help (re)produce gender and gender inequality, beginning with a wider overview of feminist policy studies and then connecting the available knowledge from different subdisciplines. It then examines the early studies on the analysis of the lack of women in the policy-making process. The next section explains the broader context and process of policy making and how political goals or interests that come from different feminist movements manage in the policy-making process. The article also discusses the genderedness of policy making, gendered bias, and recent developments in research on gender and gender equality. Keywords: Policy making, feminist policy studies, political goals, feminist movements, genderedness, gendered bias, gender equality Introduction Policy-making is an ongoing process of planning, executing, and evaluating interventions by states, at different levels of government, including the establishment of institutions, to define the rules steering society. As a result of these interventions or attempts at it, existing inequalities across all domains are affected in their nature or degree. As such, policy making can (re)produce gender+1 inequality or counteract it, through a reactive diagnosis or a proactive prescription. Starting with feminist activists and scholars challenging a lack of attention for sex and gender in policy initiatives and in policy-making literature, and accompanied by attempts at bringing women in and addressing the genderedness of policy making and the broader context thereof, a field evolved that contains both elements of diagnosis and prescription. More recently, similarly to policy praxis, this academic field focuses more broadly on the design, implementation, and evaluation of policies and strategies furthering gender+ equality. A growing number of gender+ scholars coming from a broad range of disciplines such as politics, anthropology, economics, geography, history, law, or social science studies specific policy fields such as child care, domestic violence, healthcare, labor market policies, reproducti...

Related to Policy Making

  • Policy Because the volume of human genomic and phenotypic data maintained in these repositories is substantial and, in some instances, potentially sensitive (e.g., data related to the presence or risk of developing particular diseases or conditions and information regarding family relationships or ancestry), data must be shared in a manner consistent with the research participants’ informed consent, and the confidentiality of the data and the privacy of participants must be protected. Access to human genomic data will be provided to research investigators who, along with their institutions, have certified their agreement with the expectations and terms of access detailed below. NIH expects that, through Data Access Request (DAR) process, approved users of controlled-access datasets recognize any restrictions on data use established by the Submitting Institutions through the Institutional Certification, and as stated on the dbGaP study page. Definitions of the underlined terminology in this document are found in section 13. The parties to this Agreement include: the Principal Investigator (PI) requesting access to the genomic study dataset (an “Approved User”), the PI’s home institution (the “Requester”) as represented by the Institutional Signing Official designated through the eRA Commons system, and the NIH. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the DAR Approval Date, as specified in the notification of approval of the Data Access Committee (DAC).

  • Policy Review Patent Policy and related Procedures shall be reviewed every five (5) years.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.