Common use of The Xxxx Clause in Contracts

The Xxxx. In the case of both favorable and unfavorable RPT recommendations by a Chair/Xxxx’x designee, the Xxxx of the college or school shall review the candidate’s dossier for RPT, unless the candidate elects to withdraw in writing his or her candidacy for second reappointment, promotion or tenure, in which case no further review shall be done. The Faculty Standards Committee (“FSC”) of the college or school shall also review the candidate for RPT, employing approved RPT criteria. Composition of the FSC is determined by the College/School/Unit and is not subject to the voting limitations outlined in Section 5.f.ii above. The FSC will assess the candidate’s record and make a written recommendation to the Xxxx on the proposed personnel action under review, which will include the numerical anonymous vote of the Committee. Following review of the FSC’s assessment and recommendation, the Xxxx will issue a written assessment and recommendation employing approved RPT criteria regarding the personnel action under review, which shall be included in the dossier. Nothing shall preclude the Xxxx from discussing the candidate's record with the faculty member herself/himself prior to her/his decision but the Xxxx shall be under no obligation to do so. The faculty member shall receive from the Xxxx a copy of the FSC’s and the Xxxx’x written assessments and may add a written rebuttal to the file within ten (10) days of the date the letter was delivered either by email or by email and hand. Except in cases where the Xxxx’x decision is the final University action, a faculty member may elect to withdraw his or her request for RPT action within fifteen days of receipt of the Xxxx’x assessment. The faculty member shall communicate his/her decision to withdraw the file in writing to the Department Chair and Xxxx.

The Xxxx. In the case of both favorable and unfavorable RPT recommendations by a Chair/Xxxx’x designee, the Xxxx of the college or school shall review the candidate’s dossier for RPT, unless the candidate elects to withdraw in writing his or her candidacy for second reappointment, promotion or tenure, in which case no further review shall be done. The Faculty Standards Committee (“FSC”) of the college or school shall also review the candidate for RPT, employing approved RPT criteria. Composition of the FSC is determined by the College/School/Unit and is not subject to the voting limitations outlined in Section 5.f.ii above. The FSC will assess the candidate’s record and make a written recommendation to the Xxxx on the proposed personnel action under review, which will include the numerical anonymous vote of the Committee. Following review of the FSC’s assessment and recommendation, the Xxxx will issue a written assessment and recommendation employing approved RPT criteria regarding the personnel action under review, which shall be included in the dossier. Nothing shall preclude the Xxxx from discussing the candidate's record with the faculty member herself/himself prior to her/his decision but the Xxxx shall be under no obligation to do so. The faculty member shall receive from the Xxxx a copy of the FSC’s and the Xxxx’x written assessments and may add a written rebuttal to the file within ten (10) days of the date the letter was delivered either by email or by email and hand. Except in cases where the Xxxx’x decision is the final University action, a faculty member may elect to withdraw his or her request for RPT action within fifteen days of receipt of the Xxxx’x assessment. The faculty member shall communicate his/her decision to withdraw the file in writing to the Department Chair and Xxxx.

The Xxxx. In the case of both favorable and unfavorable RPT recommendations by a Chair/Xxxx’x designee, the Xxxx of the college or school shall review the candidate’s dossier for RPT, unless the candidate elects to withdraw in writing his or her their candidacy for second reappointment, promotion or tenure, in which case no further review shall be done. The Faculty Standards Committee (“FSC”) of the college or school shall also review the candidate for RPT, employing approved RPT criteria. Composition of the FSC is determined by the College/School/Unit and is not subject to the voting limitations outlined in Section 5.f.ii above. The FSC will assess the candidate’s record and make a written recommendation to the Xxxx on the proposed personnel action under review, which will include the numerical anonymous vote of the Committee. Following review of the FSC’s assessment and recommendation, the Xxxx will issue a written assessment and recommendation employing approved RPT criteria regarding the personnel action under review, which shall be included in the dossier. Nothing shall preclude the Xxxx from discussing the candidate's record with the faculty member herself/himself prior to her/his their decision but the Xxxx shall be under no obligation to do so. The faculty member shall receive from the Xxxx a copy of the FSC’s and the Xxxx’x written assessments and may add a written rebuttal to the file within ten (10) days of the date the letter was delivered either by email or by email and hand. Except in cases where the Xxxx’x decision is the final University action, a faculty member may elect to withdraw his or her their request for RPT action within fifteen days of receipt of the Xxxx’x assessment. The faculty member shall communicate his/her their decision to withdraw the file in writing to the Department Chair and Xxxx.