Reason for Categorization. The Project is not located in a sensitive area, nor has sensitive characteristics, nor falls into sensitive sectors under the JICA Guidelines for Environmental and Social Considerations (April, 2010), and its potential adverse impacts on the environment are not likely to be significant.
Reason for Categorization. The Project falls under the thermal power generation sector under the “JICA guidelines for environmental and social considerations” (issued in April 2010).
Reason for Categorization. This project will not have substantial undesirable impact on the environment given the characteristics of the sector and the characteristics of the project area under the JICA Environmental and Social Guidelines (established in April 2010).
Reason for Categorization. The project does not correspond to “a large scale project among road sector projects” under the “Japan Bank for International Cooperation Guidelines for the Confirmation of Environmental and Social Considerations” (established in April 2002) and its potential adverse impacts on the environment are not likely to be significant. The project sites are not located in environmentally and socially sensitive areas, nor has it sensitive characteristics as stipulated in the Guidelines. Therefore, the project falls under the category B.
Reason for Categorization. The project is not located in a sensitive characteristics, nor does it fall into sensitive sectors under the JBIC Guidelines for Confirmation of Environmental and Social Considerations (April 2002), and its potential adverse impact on the environment is not likely to be significant.
Reason for Categorization. The Project is categorized as A because its sector and area falls under sensitive power generation sectors and sensitive areas set forth in the JBIC Guidelines for Confirmation of Environmental and Social Considerations (established in April, 2002).
Reason for Categorization. The Project is likely to have significant adverse impact due to its characteristics under the JICA Guidelines for Environmental and Social Conditions (published in April 2010) (hereinafter referred to as “JICA Environmental Guidelines”).
Reason for Categorization. The project does not fall under the large-scale water supply sector as per the “Japan International Cooperation Agency Guidelines for Environmental and Social Consideration” (issued in April 2010, hereafter, “JICA Guidelines for Environmental and Social Consideration”), and is judged to have minimum undesired impact on the environment. In addition, the project does not include any characteristics likely to cause an impact or areas susceptible to impact as specified by the JICA Guidelines for Environmental and Social Consideration.
Reason for Categorization. The Project’s potential adverse impacts on the environment are deemed insignificant as defined by the JICA Guidelines for Environmental and Social Considerations of April 2010 (“the JICA Guidelines”), in terms of sector description, project description, and site description.
Reason for Categorization. The project is neither considered to be a large-scale airport project, nor located in a sensitive area, and has none of the sensitive characteristics under the JICA guidelines for environmental and social considerations (April 2010). It is not likely to have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
