Maintenance Pre-Review Process Sample Clauses

Maintenance Pre-Review Process. A Joint Maintenance Pre-Review Committee, which will consist of two members from the JJEC (one from management and one for the union) and two members of the Steering Committee (one from management and one for the union) who will review all requests for maintenance review, in order to determine if the job is eligible for maintenance review. The Joint Maintenance Pre-review Committee will review the Job Evaluation Maintenance Review Request Questionnaire (as attached) and will determine if the job’s skill, responsibility, effort or working conditions have changed enough to potentially impact the rating. Changes to a job must be permanent and in place for at least six (6) months before being considered by the Joint Maintenance Pre- Review Committee. The Joint Maintenance Pre-Review Committee will conduct decision making by way of a simple majority. If the committee reaches a split decision the job being reviewed will be forwarded to the JJEC with the necessary information so they may conduct a maintenance review. The Joint Maintenance Pre-Review Committee will ensure the integrity of the job evaluation process by identifying any issues with respect to the content of job descriptions and forwarding the issues to Human Resources for consideration. When reviewing a job, the Committee may recommend that other jobs be submitted for review, if they are potentially impacted by changes to the job being reviewed.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Maintenance Pre-Review Process

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Interview Process Interviews will take place over a period of ninety (90) days. The interviews both of bargaining unit employees and of managers will be conducted jointly by Union/Industry members of the Technical Committee (or designates).

  • Independent Review and Inspection The Owner may undertake independent inspection of the installation of the Work. Such independent inspector shall operate on behalf of the Owner and shall act to protect the best interests of the Owner.

  • Readiness Review Includes all plans to be implemented in one or more Service Areas on the anticipated Operational Start Date. At a minimum, the HMO shall, for each HMO Program:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.