Life Cycle Costs. If specified in TDS 33.6, an adjustment to consider the additional life cycle costs for the period specified below, such as the operating and maintenance costs of the Goods, will be added to the Tender price, for evaluation purposes only. The adjustment will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology specified below and the following information: [Note to Procuring Entity: Life cycle costing should be used when the costs of operation and/or maintenance over the specified life of the goods are estimated to be considerable in comparison with the initial cost and may vary among different Tenders. Life cycle costs shall be evaluated on a net present value basis. If life cycle costs apply, then specify the factors required to determine them for evaluation purposes. [Either amend the following text as required, or delete if life cycle cost is not applicable]
Life Cycle Costs the costs during the life of the goods or equipment No (f) the performance and productivity of the equipment offered No. (g) [insert any other specific criteria in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria] F.
Life Cycle Costs. Not Applicable
Life Cycle Costs. 10.3.1.10 Calculations showing probable cost comparisons of various alternatives considered;
Life Cycle Costs. If specified in TDS 33.6, an adjustment to consider the additional life cycle costs for the period specified below, such as the operating and maintenance costs of the Goods, will be added to the Tender price, for evaluation purposes only. The adjustment will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology specified below and the following information:
Life Cycle Costs. Utilizes existhg infrastructure = Same as Architecture #1 - Requires new/modified management center and relocation of traffic agency resources; major organizational culture change Minimize implementation costs - Same as Architecture # 1 - Same as Architecture # 1 - Requires additional equipment to establish Regional ITS Management System -- Requires large short term investment to transition to a Regional Traffic Management Center and establish Regional ITS Management System . Minimize operations and maintenance costs * Baseline Cost - Requires communications maintenance at each traffic center(s) - Requires communications maintenance at each Regional ITS Management System - Same as Architecture #2 * Not Applicable * Not Applicable - Requires additional resources to operate and maintain Regional ITS Management System + Potential exists to reduce cost for operations and maintenance due to one regionwide traffic management center File: TC!EVAL.WPD August 29, 1996 - c Traffic Control Service Architecture Trade-off Evaluation Useability: (Ease of Operations): Traffic center specific information tailoring Coordinated decision making for assessing a common traffic conditions view Operations workload: • Data Distribution • System Management Customer Preferences/Constraints: • Reflects current business practices Other:
Life Cycle Costs. Measure description: Measures both the direct capital cost, financing, and O&M over the long term, and enables capital vs. O&M to be optimized. It is also used to compare alternatives. Efficiency or cost saving activity measured: Will significantly affect decisions during planning and design phases for long-term cost optimizing. It also factors key cost components into the decision process, such as energy, automation, and so on. How measured/implemented: We need to establish a basic methodology that can be used consistently, then create specific methodology for types of facilities and equipment that includes assumptions and standards. We also need to establish our ability to use and update the methodology. Part of the implementation should include establishing points in project timelines to update lifetime costs comprehensively, such as planning, design (at 30 percent, 60 percent, and 90 percent), construction, and startup. Advantages • Optimize early on for entire project • Better design making • Compares capital vs. O&M savings • Early warning about rate impacts Disadvantages • We do not have a history of lifetime costs to use • Assumptions have to be updated • More work for project managers and project teams Attachment C-10
Life Cycle Costs. (Millions of 2003$) Alternative(s) Expenditures Remaining Equity (Salvage Value) Net Present Value C3(a) 189.2 30.9 158.3 C3(b) 158.2 25.4 132.8 C4 185.2 27.6 157.6 D1 122.9 16.9 106.1 F1 219.9 28.6 191.4 F3 196.9 28.6 168.4 F3 with channel modifications 207.9 28.6 179.4 G2 94.7 4.7 90.0 G3 1027 4.7 98.0 G4 94.7 4.7 88.0 No Action 16.9 4.3 12.6 Source: Gravina Access Project Cost Estimate Summary spreadsheet provided by HDR on April 25, 2003.
Life Cycle Costs the costs during the life of the goods or equipment [insert Yes or No. If yes, insert the Methodology and criteria in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria] (f)
Life Cycle Costs. If specified in TDS 33.6, an adjustment to consider the additional life cycle costs for the period specified below, such as the operating and maintenance costs of the Goods, will be added to the Tender price, for evaluation purposes only. The adjustment will be evaluated in accordance with the methodology specified below and the following information: number of years for life cycle cost determination the discount rate to be applied to determine the net present value of the life-cycle- cost the annual operating and maintenance costs (recurrent costs) shall be determined on the basis of the following methodology and the following information is required from tenderers Performance and productivity of the equipment: Performance and productivity of the equipment. An adjustment representing the capitalized cost of additional operating costs over the life of the goods will be added to the Tender price, for evaluation purposes if specified in the TDS 33.6. The adjustment will be evaluated based on the drop in the guaranteed performance or efficiency offered in the Tender below the norm of 100, using the methodology specified below. or An adjustment to consider the productivity of the goods offered in the Tender will be added to the Tender price, for evaluation purposes only, if specified in ITT 33.6. The adjustment will be evaluated based on the cost per unit of the actual productivity of goods offered in the Tender with respect to minimum required values, using the methodology specified below. Specific additional criteria [Other specific additional criteria to be considered in the evaluation, and the evaluation method shall be detailed in TDS 34.6][If specific sustainable procurement technical requirements have been specified in Section VII- Specification, either state that (i) those requirements will be evaluated on a pass/fail (compliance basis) or otherwise (ii) in addition to evaluating those requirements on a pass/fail (compliance basis), if applicable, specify the monetary adjustments to be applied to Tender Prices for comparison purposes on account of Tenders that exceed the specified minimum sustainable procurement technical requirements.]
