IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT Sample Clauses

IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT. A. Mitigation of Effects to Above Ground Historic Resources Previously, Buckeye commissioned an architectural field survey of above ground historic resources (Xxxxxxx et al., 2011). The survey strategy was based on a work plan developed in consultation with USFWS and SHPO (Xxxxx and Xxxxxxx, 2010). The architectural field survey was completed in 2010 based on the proposed 52 turbine locations established during development of the Buckeye Wind Farm. The survey documented 1,475 individual properties located in the rural areas and crossroads communities of the survey area, and an additional 44 blocks in Mechanicsburg and 283 blocks in Urbana were assessed. Based on the archival research, field survey, and public involvement, it was determined that the agricultural heritage of the survey area is what makes the historic landscape unique and that historic farmsteads and farmhouses, one-room schoolhouses, churches, cemeteries, and crossroads communities are character-defining property types that contribute to one’s appreciation of the area’s historic landscape. The number and size of the proposed turbines could affect the perception of the traditional rural historic landscape, changing important qualities of the setting in which many of the character-defining historic property types are located. While the proposed project will not affect any above-round historic resources in the direct APE, given the presence of known historic properties within the indirect APE, as well as the results of the field survey that suggest the presence of many other likely historic properties and potential historic landscapes within the indirect APE, USFWS has determined that the proposed project will result in an Adverse Effect to historic properties as defined in 36 CFR 800.5. Based on the nature of the proposed project, avoidance or minimization of these indirect impacts is impractical. Consequently, creative mitigation measures will be employed in order to promote the continued preservation and meaningfulness of the survey area’s rural history. As outlined in their letter of October 27, 2011, SHPO concurs with this finding and supports such a mitigation approach. Given the landscape level approach employed for the architectural survey, the Buckeye Wind Farm findings of the project were anticipated to be applicable to Buckeye II Wind Farm. A supplementary field survey was completed in 2013 to take into consideration the proposed Buckeye II Wind Farm turbine locations. The survey str...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT. A. Identification: In accordance with 36 CFR § 800.4(a) through (c), RUS, USACE, USFWS, SHPOs, Consulting Tribes, and Dairyland shall consult to identify the appropriate level of effort needed to identify historic properties, including those to which Indian tribes attach religious and cultural significance. The level of effort for the study shall meet the reasonable and good faith regulatory standard [36 CFR 800.6 and 800.4(b)].
Sample 1
IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT. A. Mitigation of Effects to Above Ground Historic Resources Previously, Xxxxxx Ridge commissioned a desktop review of above ground historic resources in the FRWF Phase IV direct APE. The desktop review found no National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed historic resources within the footprint of the 94 FRWF Phase IV turbines; therefore, none would be directly affected by the project. A total of 73 resources which are listed in SHAARD as “Notable” (i.e., potentially eligible for the NRHP), or “Outstanding” (i.e., considered eligible for the NRHP) are located within the indirect APE, within one mile of a FRWF Phase IV turbine. Additionally, three resources located within the town of Xxxxxx are actually listed on the NRHP. In a letter dated September 17, 2012, USFWS found that construction of FRWF Phase IV would have no adverse effect on these 76 structures due to their location within the town and their current rating status in SHAARD. SHPO, in a letter dated October 18, 2012, concurred with this finding. Therefore, no mitigation is required for above ground resources within the indirect APE.
Sample 1

Related to IDENTIFICATION AND TREATMENT

  • Identification Badges Identification badges will be supplied by Advanced Behavioral Health (ABH) to all credentialed individuals who are providing services to children. Badges must be presented to the child/youth and any present adults at the time of service and must be worn for the duration of the service. Badges will be updated every two years during the re- credentialing process. Any individual or agency who fails to submit a photo ID to ABH within the designated timeframe will have their credentialing status terminated.

  • Non-Identification Approved Users agree not to use the requested datasets, either alone or in concert with any other information, to identify or contact individual participants from whom data and/or samples were collected. Approved Users also agree not to generate information (e.g., facial images or comparable representations) that could allow the identities of research participants to be readily ascertained. These provisions do not apply to research investigators operating with specific IRB approval, pursuant to 45 CFR 46, to contact individuals within datasets or to obtain and use identifying information under an 2 The project anniversary date can be found in “My Projects” after logging in to the dbGaP authorized-access portal. IRB-approved research protocol. All investigators including any Approved User conducting “human subjects research” within the scope of 45 CFR 46 must comply with the requirements contained therein.

  • Identification When performing work on District property, Contractor shall be in appropriate work attire (or uniform, if applicable) at all times. If Contractor does not have a specific uniform, then Contractor shall provide identification tags and/or any other mechanism the District in its sole discretion determines is required to easily identify Contractor. Contractor and its employees shall (i) display on their clothes the above-mentioned identifying information and (ii) carry photo identification and present it to any District personnel upon request. If Contractor cannot produce such identification or if the identification is unacceptable to District, District may provide at its sole discretion, District-produced identification tags to Contractor, costs to be borne by Contractor.

  • Identification of Goods Identification of the goods shall not be deemed to have been made until both Buyer and Seller have agreed that the goods in question are to be appropriate to the performance of this Agreement.

  • Client identification 9.1. The Company has the right to require the Client to confirm his/her registration information specified when opening a trading account. To do so, the Company may ask the Client at its own discretion and at any time to provide a notarized electronic copy of his/her identification document, bank statement or public utilities bill as a proof of residence. In particular cases, the Company may ask the Client to provide a photo of him/her holding his/her ID near his/her face. The detailed client identification requirements are set out in the “AML policies” section on the Company’s official site.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.