Grounds for refusal. Under Clause 1 of Article 1377 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation the application for grant of a patent for an industrial design shall be related to one industrial design or to a group of industrial designs associated with each other so closely as to form a single creative concept (the requirement of unity of the industrial design). This requirement is met where there is: one independent and distinct industrial design; or one industrial design and its variants differing from that industrial design by visually non-essential features and/or by color combination; or a group of industrial designs belonging to the same set of articles, as well as one or more industrial designs for separate articles belonging to the same set of articles. It is required that all industrial designs of the group shall belong to the same class of International Classification for Industrial Designs (Locarno classification). Under Clause 1 of Article 1352 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation the essential features of an industrial design shall include features determining the aesthetic characteristics of the external appearance of the article, in particular, the shape, configuration, ornamentation, combination of colors, lines, contours of the article, texture or material of the article. The essential features of the external appearance are recognized as essential if they determine the aesthetic characteristics of the external appearance of an article, being dominant and determine the overall visual impression. The non-essential features of the external appearance include such slightly distinguishable and inexpressive features of the external appearance of an article, the exclusion of which from the set of the features of the external appearance does not lead to a change the overall visual impression (clause 72 of the Rules for the drafting, filing and examination of the documents, that are the basis for legally significant actions on the state registration of an industrial design). The claimed group of industrial designs includes: the industrial design 1: fig. 1.1-1.7; the industrial design 2: fig. 2.1-2.7. The claimed group of industrial designs does not meet the requirement of unity of the industrial design. Only one of the claimed industrial designs of this application can be considered.
Grounds for refusal. 1. The description does not fully disclose all the designs as required in Article 103(2)(a) of the Intellectual Property Law of Viet Nam, since the description does not point out all main appearance characteristics of the designs. This reason for refusal may be overcome by submitting a corrected version of description to replace the current description.
Grounds for refusal. The industrial design applied for registration does not meet the provisions of the Article 8 of the Law on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, because the overall impression it produces on the informed user is not different from the overall impression produced on such a user by the industrial design from EUIPO, (11) 000864764-0064, deposit date (00) 00.00.0000, publication date (00) 00.00.0000, owner: Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx GmbH + Co. KG, Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx. 00, X-00000 Welzheim, ALEMANIA. (LAW of the Republic of Moldova on the Protection of Industrial Design No. 161/2007, Art. 26 (1) b) )
Grounds for refusal. The international registration designating Singapore is not entitled to protection under Rule 4(1) of the Registered Designs (International Registration) Rules. The requirements for registration of a design under the Registered Designs Act (Cap. 266) and the Registered Designs Rules (R 1) have not been satisfied, for the following reason(s): (i) Section 2(1) of the Registered Designs Act requires a design to be applied to an article or non-physical product. The design for which protection is sought does not appear to be applied to any article or non-physical product; the indication of product (“article name”) as currently stated in the international registration designating Singapore may not be regarded as an article or non-physical product. Ideas Today. Assets Tomorrow.
Grounds for refusal. Novelty - The registered design does not fulfill the requirement of Articles 56 of Industrial Property Code Articles of the national law applicable on the matter (see extracted law to the below):
Grounds for refusal. 1. Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances:
Grounds for refusal. The contribution in the context of the Brainport Eindhoven Region Deal can be refused, if:
Grounds for refusal. 1. Without prejudice to the provisions of the General Terms and Conditions, a financial contribution from the Region Deal will always be refused and/or recovered, if:
Grounds for refusal. No assignments of this Agreement are contemplated or bargained for except for those to which Xxxxxx has given consent in this Agreement. Except as provided above with respect to Xxxxxx’s assignment of the Agreement to a purchaser of Lot 12, Lessor has the absolute right for any reason or for no reason in its sole discretion to give or withhold consent to any assignment or to impose any conditions upon any assignment. Lessee shall pay to Lessor the sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500) as a fee for legal and administrative expenses related to any assignment or any request for consent to an assignment. Xxxxxx’s aviation director shall have authority in his sole and absolute authority to decrease the amount of said fee.
Grounds for refusal. The description includes the disclaim, therefore the claimed object is not the whole article. Thus, the subject matter contained in the registration cannot be circulated independently, therefore it is not the object of protection as industrial design as provided in Article 33(2)(b) of Circular No. 01/2007/TT-BKHCN. This refusal may be overcome by submitting the corrected version of description in which the disclaim has been removed.
