Dispute Process - Choices Sample Clauses

Dispute Process - Choices. Where there is no agreement as to whether the job is to be non-bargaining unit or bargaining unit by the end of the meeting with the Director of Labour Relations (or designate) and the Union designate, the disagreement can be referred directly to the Grievance Settlement Board as a policy grievance in accordance with Article 12.09.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Dispute Process - Choices. Where there is no agreement as to whether the job is to be NBU or BU by the end of the meeting with the Director of Labour Relations (or designate) and the Union designate, the disagreement will be processed as outlined below:
Sample 1Sample 2
Dispute Process - Choices. Where there is no agreement as to whether the job is to be or by the end of the meeting with the Manager of Labour Relations (or designate) and the Union designate, the disagreement will be processed as outlined below: Where agreed to by both parties, refer the issue to a mutually agreed third party (arbitrator) for a final and binding decision, or Refer the issue to the Grievance Settlement Board or Labour Relations Board for a final and binding decision. The parties recognize that the fifteen (15) working day timeframe specified in Article “12.07 Arbitration” will apply for referring a dispute to either the Labour Relations Board, or third party arbitration. The fifteen (15) working days will commence on the day after the information is received.
Sample 1
Dispute Process - Choices. Where there is no agreement as to whether the job is to be NBU or BU by the end of the meeting with the Director of Labour Relations (or designate) and the Union designate, the disagreement can be referred directly to the Grievance Settlement Board as a policy grievance in accordance with article 12.09. The costs of administering the arbitration process will be equally shared between the Employer and the Union.
Sample 1

Related to Dispute Process - Choices

  • Dispute Process In the event of any Dispute, the Parties agree that they shall undertake a process to promote the resolution of a Dispute in the following order:

  • Formal Dispute Process Members representing: (i) any one of the three state Participant Groups or (ii) an aggregate of at least six (6) votes, may appeal the informal Dispute by signing and furnishing to the Regional Director, the Program Manager, and each other Member, a written request to initiate a formal Dispute. This request must, with reasonable specificity, identify the issue(s) in Dispute, the relief sought, and any supporting documentation. If such a request is not received by the Regional Director within ten

  • DISPUTE PROCEDURE (1) Unless otherwise provided in the Council's Constitution or in this Collective Agreement, any dispute within the registered scope of the Council shall be resolved as set out below:

  • Dispute Procedures The Final Settlement Statement shall become final and binding on the Parties on the 45th day following the date the Final Settlement Statement is received by MLP, unless prior to such date MLP delivers written notice to HOLDINGS of its disagreement with the Final Settlement Statement (a “Settlement Notice”). Any Settlement Notice shall set forth MLP’s proposed changes to the Final Settlement Statement, including an explanation in reasonable detail of the basis on which MLP proposes such changes. If MLP has timely delivered a Settlement Notice, MLP and HOLDINGS shall use good faith efforts to reach written agreement on the disputed items. If the disputed items have not been resolved by MLP and HOLDINGS by the 30th day following HOLDINGS’ receipt of a Settlement Notice, any remaining disputed items shall be submitted to the Independent Accountants for resolution within ten (10) Business Days after the end of the foregoing 30-day period. The fees and expenses of the Independent Accountants shall be borne fifty percent (50%) by HOLDINGS and fifty percent (50%) by MLP. The Independent Accountants’ determination of the disputed items shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and the Parties hereby waive any and all rights to dispute such resolution in any manner, including in court, before an arbiter or appeal.

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Process Owner may establish a dispute resolution process to be utilized in advance of that outlined in Tex. Gov’t Code, Chapter 2260.

  • Customer Service, Dispute Resolution If you have a question about your XOOM charges or service you may contact XOOM directly by calling 0-000-000-0000 Monday – Friday 8 (eight) a.m. to 11 (eleven)p.m.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Process 1. In the event there is a dispute under this Centralized Contract, the Contractor, OGS and Authorized User agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The Contractor, OGS and Authorized User shall, without delay, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Centralized Contract which are not affected by the dispute. Primary responsibility for resolving any dispute arising under this Centralized Contract shall rest with the Authorized User’s Contractor Coordinators and the Contractor’s Account Executive and the State & Local Government Regional General Manager.

  • Dispute Resolution Process Any claim, dispute or other matter in question not resolved by the process identified in Paragraph

  • CENTRAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to disputes and grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Board Collective Bargaining Act, 2014 central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply. In the event that central language is being grieved locally, the local parties shall provide the grievance to their respective central agents.

  • Mini-Bid Dispute Resolution Process If the Authorized User does not have a dispute resolution policy, please refer to OSC or OGS dispute resolution policy for guidance in creating a policy. In the event the Contractor has any disputes with the Authorized User, the Contractor shall so notify the Authorized User in writing. If either party notifies the other of such dispute, the other party shall then make good faith efforts to solve the problem or settle the dispute amicably, including meeting with the party’s representatives to attempt diligently to reach a satisfactory result through negotiation. In the event that the Contractor and the Authorized User are unable to resolve a conflict through negotiation, then both parties will comply with the Authorized User’s stated dispute resolution policy which must be included as part of the Authorized User Agreement. If the conflict is still unresolved, please refer to section 4.2.1.II.A.3 for guidance. Mini-Bid Proposal Validity All Contractor responses to Authorized User Mini-Bids must remain open and valid for at least 60 days from the Mini-Bid opening date, unless the time for awarding the Authorized User Agreement is extended by mutual consent of the Authorized User and the Contractor. A Contractor’s Mini-Bid response shall continue to remain an effective offer, firm and irrevocable, subsequent to such 60 day period until either tentative award of the Authorized User Agreement by the Authorized User is made or withdrawal of the Contractor response in writing by the Contractor. Tentative award of the Authorized User Agreement shall consist of written notice to that effect by an Authorized User to a successful Contractor, who shall thereupon be obligated to execute a formal Authorized User Agreement. SIGNATURE PAGE

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.